<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blog Physica</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogphysica.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Interesting Topics and Resources in Physics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:56:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on An interesting experiment by sandrar</title>
		<link>http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/an-interesting-experiment/#comment-25369</link>
		<dc:creator>sandrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/an-interesting-experiment/#comment-25369</guid>
		<description>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post... nice! I love your blog.  :) Cheers! Sandra. R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post&#8230; nice! I love your blog.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Cheers! Sandra. R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chladni Plates by Japanese words</title>
		<link>http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/chladni-plates/#comment-23048</link>
		<dc:creator>Japanese words</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/chladni-plates/#comment-23048</guid>
		<description>Wow that was very impressive. I am off to find one of demos you mentioned above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that was very impressive. I am off to find one of demos you mentioned above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics ? by Knut Holt</title>
		<link>http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2006/04/01/do-we-really-understand-quantum-mechanics/#comment-19547</link>
		<dc:creator>Knut Holt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2006/04/01/do-we-really-understand-quantum-mechanics/#comment-19547</guid>
		<description>I do not think quantum mechanics give any deeper knowlwdge at all. It is solely a procedure for predicting the possibiity of observational results, nothing else.

Therefore it is nothing to understand beyond this. To get an understanding, something entirely new must be developed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think quantum mechanics give any deeper knowlwdge at all. It is solely a procedure for predicting the possibiity of observational results, nothing else.</p>
<p>Therefore it is nothing to understand beyond this. To get an understanding, something entirely new must be developed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Field Theory by Vivek Saxena</title>
		<link>http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/books-and-reviewsunder-construction/field-theory/#comment-19298</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek Saxena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogphysica.wordpress.com/books-and-reviewsunder-construction/field-theory/#comment-19298</guid>
		<description>An Introduction to Realistic Quantum Physics, by Giuliano Preparata [http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Realistic-Quantum-Physics/dp/9812381767]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Introduction to Realistic Quantum Physics, by Giuliano Preparata [http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Realistic-Quantum-Physics/dp/9812381767]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anderson&#8217;s article by jenifer</title>
		<link>http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2006/05/06/journal-club-for-condensed-matter-physics/#comment-18438</link>
		<dc:creator>jenifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2006/05/06/journal-club-for-condensed-matter-physics/#comment-18438</guid>
		<description>AT FINITE TEMPERATURE THERE WILL BE FLUCTUATIONS WHICH WILL DRIVE THE SYSTEM TO A LOW ENERGY STATE IN COMPETITION WITH THE INTERACTION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT FINITE TEMPERATURE THERE WILL BE FLUCTUATIONS WHICH WILL DRIVE THE SYSTEM TO A LOW ENERGY STATE IN COMPETITION WITH THE INTERACTION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by AK</title>
		<link>http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/about/#comment-17759</link>
		<dc:creator>AK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17759</guid>
		<description>HI Guys, 
Very Good Initiative. 
Check out this great list of free video lectures on Physics 
http://freevideolectures.com/physics.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Guys,<br />
Very Good Initiative.<br />
Check out this great list of free video lectures on Physics<br />
<a href="http://freevideolectures.com/physics.html" rel="nofollow">http://freevideolectures.com/physics.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LaTeX at last ! (Illustrated with a GR calculation) by nayagam</title>
		<link>http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2007/02/18/latex-at-last-illustrated-with-a-gr-calculation/#comment-17740</link>
		<dc:creator>nayagam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2007/02/18/latex-at-last-illustrated-with-a-gr-calculation/#comment-17740</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re indeed right. Have corrected the mistake now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re indeed right. Have corrected the mistake now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LaTeX at last ! (Illustrated with a GR calculation) by Tejaswi</title>
		<link>http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2007/02/18/latex-at-last-illustrated-with-a-gr-calculation/#comment-17733</link>
		<dc:creator>Tejaswi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2007/02/18/latex-at-last-illustrated-with-a-gr-calculation/#comment-17733</guid>
		<description>Sorry to be pedantic, but isn&#039;t that the negative of the traceless part of the tensor of inertia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to be pedantic, but isn&#8217;t that the negative of the traceless part of the tensor of inertia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interesting experiment by Tejaswi</title>
		<link>http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/an-interesting-experiment/#comment-17732</link>
		<dc:creator>Tejaswi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/an-interesting-experiment/#comment-17732</guid>
		<description>http://www.newphys.se/fnysik/3_1/kelvin/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newphys.se/fnysik/3_1/kelvin/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newphys.se/fnysik/3_1/kelvin/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Position operator generate momentum by nayagam</title>
		<link>http://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2006/04/01/does-postion-operator-generate-momentum/#comment-17391</link>
		<dc:creator>nayagam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogphysica.wordpress.com/2006/04/01/does-postion-operator-generate-momentum/#comment-17391</guid>
		<description>Hi gojib,
The momentum operator does not become ambiguous when the position operator is diagonal !

What happens is that when the position operator is diagonal, the momentum operator becomes non-diagonal which in turn leads to an uncertainty in momentum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi gojib,<br />
The momentum operator does not become ambiguous when the position operator is diagonal !</p>
<p>What happens is that when the position operator is diagonal, the momentum operator becomes non-diagonal which in turn leads to an uncertainty in momentum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
